The Family and the Sick Society

 

The Family is built on love, trust, and respect. It is the nuclear unit of society, and society can no more exist without the Family than an organism can exist without its cells. It's that simple.

However, for little over a century there have been numerous attempts to replace the family by groups, individuals, and movements who think they have something better. Social workers, human services organizations, charities, and the like, all believe that, because they have uncovered a handful of unhealthy cells, that the very nature and structure of the whole organism must and shall be irrevocably altered to suit their continued endowment by the State.

When someone alleges child abuse, the family is broken up and the child is put into foster care. Foster care is, in the majority, an abusive scam.  People become foster parents for financial benefit they think they can accrue. In the meantime, the abused child is often subjected to a level of abuse and neglect exceeding that which preceded it, but because this new arrangement has the sanction of a very corrupt State, it is allowed to continue.

Thus, our abused child is abused more and more, tossed here and there, and grows into an abusive individual who commits crimes. Thus, they are incarcerated and the State benefits further because it's employees are thus guaranteed a paycheck.  And so, sane, rational, hardworking, God-fearing people are forced to subsidize the continued existence of a society that slowly and surely degenerates into a sicker and sicker organism.

When an abused child devolves into an abusive adult and a criminal, perhaps a murderer, we place him in prison for the rest of his life at an enormous and fruitless expense to the taxpayer.  Thus, we answer crime with crime and then the bleeding-heart liberals cry that the death penalty is just an eye for an eye and therefore barbaric.  No, Bleeding-Heart. Your system is barbaric. It ensures that society's sickness will continue because you have learned to profit by it.  Even when there is a death penalty, some murderers will sit on death row for decades awaiting appeal after useless and expensive appeal, living at an expense of millions of dollars per year. Then, the procedure for the execution costs hundreds of thousands of dollars.

A box of bullets can be purchased for less than ten dollars.

And yet you allow murderers, rapists, pedophiles, drug dealers, and terrorists to continue to live safely, well-fed and well-protected at the expense of the innocent.

This can and will be stopped.  How do you stop murder? By executing murderers, and not twenty years after the fact, but within days or even hours of the establishment of their guilt. How do you stop drug abuse? By executing those who distribute drugs. How do you stop pedophilia? By executing pedophiles.  If the citizenry knows that the penalties for heinous crimes and abuses are unthinkable, they will not think of committing a heinous crime. It's that simple.

Loyalty to the Greatest Nation

 

America is the greatest nation on Earth.  Our movement knows this and embraces it as an article of faith. We do not debate this because the subject is not open for discussion any more than gravity is subject to debate. We lead the world. We are meant to lead the world. It's that simple.

However, there are loyalty and disloyalty. Some acknowledge their debt to the greatest nation on Earth and do all they can to live up to a great name.  They obey the law, they respect our traditions, they honor property rights and all the fundamental, God-given rights they and others have along with the responsibilities these rights entail.  Some do not acknowledge their debt to the greatest nation on Earth and do all they can to dishonor our great name.  They disobey and dishonor the Law. They disrespect tradition. They believe that property and all other fundamental, God-given rights are subject to the whims of some arrogant, bureaucratic committee.  These are the traitors, the scum, the culture-criminals who must be wiped out if this Great Nation is to flourish.

On what basis? What right does anyone have to persecute or eradicate those who dishonor this Great Nation? If you live in America and have benefitted from the American way of life in any degree you owe this Great nation your loyalty or your absence.

The discussion ends there.

The Supreme Being is Self-Evident

 

 

The Declaration of Independence tells us that the truths upon which this good Republic was founded are self-evident. This means they require no proof, for they are themselves that proof.  What is proof? It is any evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement. It is what a well-crafted argument establishes.  And so, these truths are the proofs of the authority of this Republic when it is properly governed.

Belief in a Creator, therefore, does not require proof. It is in and of itself a proof. Of what is it the proof? It is the proof in the justice of our cause. It proves that we are civilized and enlightened. In this time of darkness the majority do not believe in God. There are also people who still believe the earth is flat. Both groups are equally ignorant and savage. God is Reason. Reason orders the mind. A well-ordered mind produces civilization. Among civilization's fruits is rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art of the proper formulation of arguments. Most atheists prefer to throw rhetoric out the window, since it ultimately comes from the very God they are rejecting, and instead of argumentation use name-calling, threats, and insults of every variety. As I have stated already, they are ignorant savages.

You call atheism and nihilism enlightened? Then let us look to the East, to Communist China, where the atheistic government of Mao Tse Tung resulted in the deaths of at least 120 million people.  That is not civilization. That is anarchy and savagery. 

True Americans accept a Supreme Being and an absolute moral order to the universe because those are the yardsticks of civilization. We accept God. You will not see a member of Our Movement in a debate about this because, as far as he is concerned, the mere existence of such a debate is absurd. It is rather like arguing over the existence or non-existence of space. It does not even need to be explicitly formulated because it is a basic fact of our existence.  We place our trust in the Supreme Being, not man. It ends there.

The Act of Living

 

We are committed to the processes of life before we find ourselves in the act of living.   Commitment to the process of life is an altogether simple matter beginning with conception, and this commitment is made on one’s behalf.  The commitment to the processes of life is as elemental as drawing one’s next breath or next bite of food. It is largely unconscious and continues either to the moment of death or to the moment one makes the decision no longer to live. The act of living is a completely different commitment.  It begins with the first hints of a dawning awareness of the human condition.  Once we commit, we have taken upon ourselves all the difficulties associated with living, all of the benefits, and its simple monotonies. Life as an act is confronted with a certain blankness or inertia that invites the creation of meaning.  However, the question becomes one of whether we should live with a view to creating meaning or simply live and allow whatever meaning will arise to arise. Either way, we find ourselves able to assimilate the act of living long after the fact.

The American Dream Came True. God Help Us.

American civilization has been based on an ardent desire to overcome tradition through industry.  It has conceived what it considers to be a "faith" in practicality, but far from being practical, the American faith is in expedience.  It has built a boat of special interests of both the right and the left and it does not desire that the boat be rocked.  Both right and left are totally infected by the quest for profit, the idiocy of hypocrisy, and the temerity to try and pass off juvenile impulses as some great, grown-up agenda to be duplicated throughout the nation.  The Leftist whines about corporate America while blogging on his Apple Corporation Laptop, sipping a latte made with corporately-produced chemicals, wearing clothing that were either produced by a corporation, distributed by a corporation, or both; and sits in a Starbuck's, which is as corporate as corporate can be. The Right winger whines about traditional American values while making room for illegal aliens to waltz over the border. Why? Because the electoral process is a sham.  They allow corporations to walk all over the American Worker and to do irreparable harm to the American Family. American greatness is soulless, collective technocracy with a touch of aristocratic, bureaucratic abortive nonsense.  THIS is why democracy is a sham.  It is nothing more than bread and circuses; a stylized ritual where people get to decide whether they want the criminals in charge of raping America to wear red lapel pins or blue ones.  Do you still really believe that your vote is going to change the quality of your life in any way? Do you persist in thinking that the smiling, one-eyed jack you're so desperately trying to put in office will represent your interests? Are you brain-dead? You still trust Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives after nearly 300 years of organized lying, nepotism, scandal, and bureaucracy disguised as liberty? How can you be so insipidly stupid? Americans, it is time you woke up, grew up and stopped insisting that your government should be breast-feeding you. The milk is sour, maybe even poisoned. You are addicted to a substance that isn't even going to get you high.  American "Democracy" is the greatest shell game on earth. It will be stopped, and that can happen in one of a few ways. Either the People will stand in support of a movement of Nationalist, Popular interests (unlikely, since Americans seldom want what's best for them as evinced by the very existence of the Obama Administration), or the system will degenerate into a bureaucratized aristocracy where the people are systematically exploited by first this party then that one (as is already the case) or the entire matrix of American civilization will collapse and come to resemble the jungle of Compton. America, it's time you grew up and faced the truth. The dream came true. Are you happy?

Right Metaphysics

Traditional and modern society are taken to exist as antithetical to one another. However, this antithesis is more an imputation than an inherently existing distinction. The essence of the issue is a simple one: we have a physical and a metaphysical reality, and these two are intended by design to have an interactive and interdependent relationship. There is a duality to existence. Mankind has a mortal and an immortal nature.  We are Being and Becoming; composed of visible and invisible components. The mistake made by many is to suppose that duality implies two theses cannot but be antagonistic toward one another. The key characteristic of the ancient Taoist emblem of tai chi tu is integration of the two polarities.

Spiritual and physical are not intended to be enemies. The unitary or singular reality is meant to be dynamic, and this dynamism is only possible because of the existence of certain polarities that are contextual to it. Civilization progresses because the forward motion of innovation and change takes place against a broad inertial matrix. The traditional society has been taken to occupy the position of inertia and the modern the progressive. However, to refine it further, it has been assumed that the inertial is always detriment and the progressive a benefit.  However, if we are to truly accept that categories can and do shift, then it is not only possible for the progressive to function as a detriment, but it often does so, particularly when embraced without a critical eye.

For instance, we assume that the redistribution of wealth would be the hallmark of a “just” society, but the proponents of this socialist trope are willing to gloss over the simple fact that their “redistribution” is rooted in theft. The wealth of x cannot be given to y unless it has first been taken from x. This may be done with legislative sanction, but this sanction does not by necessity reflect a rule of law.  An opposing trope is the concept of universal responsibility, where all are liable to work and provide for themselves, but what they produce is theirs by right. This is usually assumed to be the theme of an exploitive bourgeoisie, grinding the laboring masses into paste.  However, if every individual cell labors according to its true capabilities, the overall result will be a stronger, healthier organism. The individual works and moves against an inertial background that he believes is resisting him, but without which his movements will not even be possible.

And so we are confronted with the interchangeability and interaction of two polarities we have traditionally thought of as being intrinsically and with hostility opposed to each other. However, the reality is that polarity is dynamic, and that which is devoid of this dynamism dies.  Civilization moves, as the cosmos moves, because of the tension between opposing powers or energies.  However, it is not a given that all motion is of benefit.  After all, an atomic chain reaction is very kinetic.  A crowd the motion of which is devoid of a governing principle becomes a rioting mob. All force must have a governing principle or set of principles. Motion without limits becomes a detriment just as inertia without limits is death.

Communism and Capitalism Have Failed

 

For much of the 20^th century the world was divided between the capitalist and communist paradigms.  However, it never once occurred to anyone in either that both were based on the same fundamental materialist view of the universe.  Both set their worlds revolving around technological advancement and production.  Both embraced production as a social relationship.  Both viewed humanity as management and workers, producers and consumers. Both sought to corral the human race, like regimented cattle, into the sociopolitical, economic, and military machinery with which they aimed to conquer the globe. This dualism of political economy is completely and totally inadequate for the needs of the human race and its ever-shifting niche in the impermanent yet total cosmos in which it finds itself. So long as human progress is viewed solely in terms of production and consumption, corporate structure and grassroots rebellion, wealth and poverty, we will have completely and continuously overlooked what is essential in the greater race.  Human beings must go from viewing themselves as managers, producers, workers and consumers to beings concerned with their total development as spiritual, mental, and substantial entities whose focus is on the fulfillment of their potential without the gross obsession with material well-being that always tends toward gross inequities, mass starvation, and acute corruption.

We must live beyond money and the obsession with consumer goods. We must be cured of the superstition that we will somehow allow the entire world to slip into deprivation and decay if civilization is not wholly driven by material interests. As with any illness, the cure lies in rooting out the causes and applying treatments that will not always be pleasing to the convalescent.  The greater the sepsis, the more powerful must be the antibiotic.  The disorder afflicting the human race will not be cured by gentle half-measures that do not root out the cause but only provide a very lucrative treatment of symptoms to be administered by an elite few. Rather, the antidote to the disease afflicting the greater race will be stringent. It will tolerate no half-cure nor attempted resurgence of the disease. We are not aiming at a remission. We aim instead to obliterate forever the fundamental disorder afflicting the greater human race.